Integration Examples and Edge Cases
Task: E4:S03:T06 – Document integration examples and edge cases
Date: 2025-12-02
Author: AI Agent (Auto)
Status: ✅ COMPLETE
Overview
This document provides worked examples and edge case documentation for the three-way integration between Kanban, Versioning, and Release Workflow in the dev-kit. It demonstrates real-world scenarios and how to handle edge cases that may arise during development.
Related Documentation:
- Integration Guide:
docs/architecture/standards-and-adrs/dev-kit-kanban-versioning-rw-integration.md - FR/BR Intake Guide:
packages/frameworks/kanban/FR_BR_INTAKE_GUIDE.md - Release Workflow Guide:
packages/frameworks/workflow mgt/docs/documentation/Developer_Docs/vwmp/release-workflow-agent-execution.md
Worked Examples
Example 1: FR → Task → Version → RW → Kanban Update
Scenario: A new Feature Request arrives for adding a validation script to check Kanban document consistency.
Step 1: Receive FR
- FR created:
docs/project-management/kanban/fr-br/FR-001-kanban-consistency-validation.md - Summary: "Add validation script to check Kanban document consistency"
- Priority: HIGH
- Scope: Epic 4 (Kanban Framework)
Step 2: Search for Existing Story
- Search Epic 4 stories for "validation" or "consistency"
- Found: Story 3 (Kanban + Versioning + RW Integration) - matches scope
- Decision: Create Task under Story 3
Step 3: Create Task
- Task created: E4:S03:T08 – Add Kanban consistency validation script
- Added to Story-003-kanban-versioning-rw-integration.md
- Task status: TODO
Step 4: Assign Version Number
-
Current version:
0.4.3.5+1(Task 5) -
New Task: Task 8
-
Update
src/fynd_deals/version.py:VERSION_TASK = 8 # Task number (Task 8: Add Kanban consistency validation script)
VERSION_BUILD = 1 # Build number (reset to 1 for new Task) -
Expected version for Task 8:
0.4.3.8+1
Step 5: Complete Work
- Developer creates validation script:
scripts/validation/validate_kanban_consistency.py - Developer tests script
- Work complete
Step 6: Trigger Release Workflow
- Developer types
RWin AI assistant - RW executes 11 steps:
- Branch Safety Check ✅
- Bump Version:
0.4.3.5+1→0.4.3.8+1(Task transition detected, TASK updated to 8, BUILD reset to 1) - Create Detailed Changelog:
CHANGELOG_v0.4.3.8+1.md - Update Main Changelog:
CHANGELOG.md - Update README (if applicable)
- Auto-update Kanban Docs:
- Epic-4.md:
**Last updated:** 2025-12-02 (v0.4.3.8+1 – Task 8 complete: Add Kanban consistency validation script) - Epic-4.md Story Checklist:
- [ ] **E4:S03 – ...** - IN PROGRESS (v0.4.3.8+1) - Epic-4.md detailed Story section: Task 8 marked complete
- Story-003.md:
**Last updated:** ...,**Version:** v0.4.3.8+1 - Story-003.md Task Checklist:
- [x] **E4:S03:T08 – ...** ✅ COMPLETE (v0.4.3.8+1) - Story-003.md detailed Task section:
**Status:** ✅ **COMPLETE** (v0.4.3.8+1) - ...
- Epic-4.md:
- Stage Files ✅
- Run Validators ✅
- Commit Changes ✅
- Create Git Tag:
v0.4.3.8+1✅ - Push to Remote ✅
Result:
- Version
v0.4.3.8+1released - Task 8 marked complete with forensic marker
- All Kanban docs updated
- Full traceability: FR → Task → Version → Changelog → Kanban → Git
Example 2: Multiple Tasks in Same Story
Scenario: Story 3 has multiple Tasks (T001, T002, T003, T004, T005, T007, T008) completed sequentially.
Task Sequence:
- T001 →
v0.4.3.1+1✅ - T002 →
v0.4.3.2+1✅ (Task transition: TASK=2, BUILD=1) - T003 →
v0.4.3.3+1✅ (Task transition: TASK=3, BUILD=1) - T004 →
v0.4.3.4+1✅ (Task transition: TASK=4, BUILD=1) - T005 →
v0.4.3.5+1✅ (Task transition: TASK=5, BUILD=1) - T007 →
v0.4.3.7+1✅ (Task transition: TASK=7, BUILD=1) - T008 →
v0.4.3.8+1✅ (Task transition: TASK=8, BUILD=1)
Key Points:
- Each Task gets its own
TASKcomponent in version BUILDresets to 1 for each new Task- RW Step 2 detects Task transitions and updates
VERSION_TASK - RW Step 2 resets
VERSION_BUILDto 1 for new Tasks - All Tasks tracked in Epic Story Checklist with version markers
Epic Story Checklist Format:
- [ ] **E4:S03 – Kanban + Versioning + RW Integration** - IN PROGRESS (v0.4.3.8+1)
- Tasks: T01 ✅ (v0.4.3.1+1), T02 ✅ (v0.4.3.2+1), T03 ✅ (v0.4.3.3+1), T04 ✅ (v0.4.3.4+1), T05 ✅ (v0.4.3.5+1), T07 ✅ (v0.4.3.7+1), T08 ✅ (v0.4.3.8+1)
Example 3: Story Completion Across Multiple Tasks
Scenario: Story 3 completes after Task 8, with all Tasks (T01-T08) completed.
Before Story Completion:
- Story status: IN PROGRESS
- Tasks: T01-T08 all complete
- Latest version:
v0.4.3.8+1
Story Completion Process:
- All Tasks in Story are complete
- Story owner reviews Story completion criteria
- Story marked as COMPLETE in Story document
- Next RW execution updates:
- Story status: COMPLETE
- Epic Story Checklist:
- [x] **E4:S03 – ...** - COMPLETE ✅ (v0.4.3.8+1) - Epic detailed Story section: Story marked complete
After Story Completion:
- Story status: COMPLETE ✅
- Story version:
v0.4.3.8+1(last Task version) - All Tasks have forensic markers
- Story has forensic marker in Epic Story Checklist
Note: Story completion doesn't create a new version. The last Task version (v0.4.3.8+1) represents the Story completion.
Example 4: Epic Progression
Scenario: Epic 4 progresses through multiple Stories (S01, S02, S03).
Story Sequence:
-
Story 1: Dev Kit Kanban Implementation
- Tasks: T01-T05
- Versions:
v0.4.1.1+1throughv0.4.1.5+1 - Status: COMPLETE ✅ (v0.4.1.5+1)
-
Story 2: FR/BR Intake to Tasks
- Tasks: T01-T05
- Versions:
v0.4.2.1+1throughv0.4.2.5+1 - Status: COMPLETE ✅ (v0.4.2.5+1)
-
Story 3: Kanban + Versioning + RW Integration
- Tasks: T01-T08 (in progress)
- Versions:
v0.4.3.1+1throughv0.4.3.8+1 - Status: IN PROGRESS (v0.4.3.8+1)
Epic Progression:
- Epic version schema:
0.4.S.T+B - Each Story increments
STORYcomponent TASKandBUILDreset for each new Story- Epic status: IN PROGRESS (not all Stories complete)
Epic Completion:
- When all Stories are COMPLETE, Epic status changes to COMPLETE
- Epic version: Last Story version (e.g.,
v0.4.3.8+1if Story 3 is last)
Edge Cases
Edge Case 1: Parallel Epic Development
Scenario: Multiple Epics (Epic 2, Epic 3, Epic 4) are developed in parallel.
Problem: How to handle version conflicts when Epics are merged?
Solution: Version schema enables parallel development:
- Epic 2:
0.2.S.T+B(e.g.,v0.2.1.1+1) - Epic 3:
0.3.S.T+B(e.g.,v0.3.1.1+1) - Epic 4:
0.4.S.T+B(e.g.,v0.4.3.8+1)
How It Works:
- Each Epic has its own version stream (different
EPICcomponent) - Versions are ordered by semantic structure, not commit time
- Changelog orders by version number (canonical ordering)
- No version conflicts because
EPICcomponent differs
Example:
Epic 2: v0.2.1.1+1 (committed 2025-12-01)
Epic 3: v0.3.1.1+1 (committed 2025-12-02)
Epic 4: v0.4.3.8+1 (committed 2025-12-02)
Changelog Order (by version, not time):
## [0.2.1.1+1] - 01-12-25
## [0.3.1.1+1] - 02-12-25
## [0.4.3.8+1] - 02-12-25
Best Practice:
- Work on epic branches (
epic/2-*,epic/3-*,epic/4-*) - Merge to
mainwhen ready - Changelog automatically orders by version number
Edge Case 2: Task Renumbering
Scenario: Task numbers need to be renumbered (e.g., Task 2 deleted, Tasks 3-5 need to become 2-4).
Problem: How to handle version numbers when Tasks are renumbered?
Solution: Version numbers are immutable. Do not change existing version numbers.
Process:
-
Do NOT change existing versions:
- Task 2 (v0.4.3.2+1) - keep as is
- Task 3 (v0.4.3.3+1) - keep as is
- Task 4 (v0.4.3.4+1) - keep as is
-
Update Kanban documents:
- Renumber Tasks in Story document (T003 → T002, T004 → T003, T005 → T004)
- Update Task references in Epic document
- Update Task Checklist
-
Future Tasks:
- Continue with next available Task number
- If Task 2 was deleted, next Task can be T002 (reusing number) or T006 (skipping)
-
Documentation:
- Add note in Story document about Task renumbering
- Explain why version numbers weren't changed (immutability)
Example:
Original: T001 (v0.4.3.1+1), T002 (v0.4.3.2+1), T003 (v0.4.3.3+1), T004 (v0.4.3.4+1)
After renumbering: T001 (v0.4.3.1+1), T002 (v0.4.3.3+1), T003 (v0.4.3.4+1)
Note: T002 version is v0.4.3.3+1 (was T003), T003 version is v0.4.3.4+1 (was T004)
Best Practice:
- Avoid Task renumbering if possible
- If necessary, document the renumbering and preserve version immutability
- Update Kanban docs to reflect new Task numbers
Edge Case 3: Story Renumbering
Scenario: Story numbers need to be renumbered (e.g., Story 2 deleted, Story 3 becomes Story 2).
Problem: How to handle version numbers when Stories are renumbered?
Solution: Version numbers are immutable. Do not change existing version numbers.
Process:
-
Do NOT change existing versions:
- Story 2 (v0.4.2.x+x) - keep as is
- Story 3 (v0.4.3.x+x) - keep as is
-
Update Kanban documents:
- Renumber Stories in Epic document (S03 → S02)
- Update Story references
- Update Story Checklist
-
Future Stories:
- Continue with next available Story number
- If Story 2 was deleted, next Story can be S002 (reusing number) or S004 (skipping)
-
Documentation:
- Add note in Epic document about Story renumbering
- Explain why version numbers weren't changed (immutability)
Example:
Original: S01 (v0.4.1.x+x), S02 (v0.4.2.x+x), S03 (v0.4.3.x+x)
After renumbering: S01 (v0.4.1.x+x), S02 (v0.4.3.x+x)
Note: S02 version is v0.4.3.x+x (was S03)
Best Practice:
- Avoid Story renumbering if possible
- If necessary, document the renumbering and preserve version immutability
- Update Kanban docs to reflect new Story numbers
Edge Case 4: Version Conflicts
Scenario: Two developers work on the same Task simultaneously, both create releases.
Problem: How to handle version conflicts when both create v0.4.3.8+1?
Solution: Version conflicts are prevented by workflow design and Git merge process.
Prevention:
-
Single Active Task:
- Only one Task should be active at a time
- Kanban enforces single active Task per Story
-
RW Step 1 Validation:
- RW Step 1 validates branch context
- Ensures work aligns with current branch
- Prevents cross-Task contamination
-
Git Merge Process:
- If two developers work on same Task, Git merge handles conflicts
- Version file conflicts are resolved manually
- Only one version number is used (the one that merges to main)
If Conflict Occurs:
-
Detect Conflict:
- Git merge conflict in
version.py - Both branches have same version number
- Git merge conflict in
-
Resolve Conflict:
- Choose one version number (usually the one that merges to main first)
- Update other branch to use next BUILD number
- Example: Branch A has
v0.4.3.8+1, Branch B should usev0.4.3.8+2
-
Document Resolution:
- Add note in changelog about conflict resolution
- Explain why specific version was chosen
Best Practice:
- Coordinate work to avoid parallel work on same Task
- Use Kanban to track active Tasks
- If parallel work is necessary, use different BUILD numbers
Edge Case 5: Skipped Task Numbers
Scenario: Task numbers are skipped (e.g., T001, T002, T004, T005 - T003 was deleted or never created).
Problem: How to handle version numbers when Task numbers are skipped?
Solution: Version numbers follow Task numbers, even if some are skipped.
Process:
-
Version Numbers Match Task Numbers:
- T001 →
v0.4.3.1+1 - T002 →
v0.4.3.2+1 - T003 → (skipped, no version)
- T004 →
v0.4.3.4+1 - T005 →
v0.4.3.5+1
- T001 →
-
No Special Handling Required:
- Version numbers don't need to be sequential
- Gaps in Task numbers are reflected in version numbers
- This is expected and acceptable
Example:
Epic 4, Story 3:
- T001 (v0.4.3.1+1) ✅
- T002 (v0.4.3.2+1) ✅
- T003 (skipped)
- T004 (v0.4.3.4+1) ✅
- T005 (v0.4.3.5+1) ✅
- T007 (v0.4.3.7+1) ✅ (T006 skipped)
Best Practice:
- Document why Task numbers were skipped
- Version numbers will reflect the gaps
- No need to "fill in" missing version numbers
Edge Case 6: Multiple Builds for Same Task
Scenario: Same Task requires multiple releases (e.g., bug fixes, iterations).
Problem: How to handle multiple releases for the same Task?
Solution: BUILD component increments for each release within the same Task.
Process:
-
First Release:
- Task: E4:S03:T08
- Version:
v0.4.3.8+1(Task 8, Build 1)
-
Second Release (same Task):
- Task: E4:S03:T08 (still active)
- Version:
v0.4.3.8+2(Task 8, Build 2) - RW Step 2 detects same Task, increments BUILD
-
Third Release (same Task):
- Task: E4:S03:T08 (still active)
- Version:
v0.4.3.8+3(Task 8, Build 3) - RW Step 2 detects same Task, increments BUILD
Example:
Task 8: Add Kanban consistency validation script
- v0.4.3.8+1: Initial implementation
- v0.4.3.8+2: Bug fix (script error handling)
- v0.4.3.8+3: Enhancement (additional validation checks)
Best Practice:
- Use BUILD increments for iterations within same Task
- When Task is complete, move to next Task (TASK increments, BUILD resets)
Troubleshooting Common Issues
Issue 1: Version TASK Component Not Updating
Symptoms:
- All Tasks in Story use
TASK=1 - BUILD increments across Tasks
Solution:
- Ensure RW Step 2 detects Task transitions
- Verify
VERSION_TASKinversion.pymatches active Task - Check RW Step 1 validation passes
Reference: T002 validation report (critical issue fixed)
Issue 2: Epic Story Checklist Not Updated
Symptoms:
- Epic Story Checklist missing version markers
- Inconsistency between Story Checklist and detailed sections
Solution:
- Ensure RW Step 6 updates ALL sections
- Verify systematic process is followed
- Check forensic marker format is canonical
Reference: T004 validation report, T007 gap resolution
Issue 3: Version Conflicts During Merge
Symptoms:
- Git merge conflict in
version.py - Two branches have same version number
Solution:
- Choose one version number (usually the one merging to main first)
- Update other branch to use next BUILD number
- Document conflict resolution
Reference: Edge Case 4 above
Issue 4: Task Renumbering Breaks Version Traceability
Symptoms:
- Task numbers renumbered, but versions don't match
- Confusion about which version belongs to which Task
Solution:
- Do NOT change existing version numbers (immutability)
- Update Kanban docs to reflect new Task numbers
- Document renumbering and version mapping
Reference: Edge Case 2 above
Best Practices Summary
1. Always Use RW for Releases
DO:
- Type
RWin AI assistant after completing work - Let RW handle version bumping and Kanban updates
- Verify all steps complete successfully
DON'T:
- Manually update version file
- Manually update Kanban docs
- Skip validation steps
2. Maintain Version Immutability
DO:
- Preserve existing version numbers
- Document any renumbering
- Explain version mapping if Tasks/Stories are renumbered
DON'T:
- Change existing version numbers
- Renumber versions to match new Task/Story numbers
- Create duplicate version numbers
3. Handle Parallel Development Correctly
DO:
- Use epic branches for parallel work
- Let version schema handle ordering (canonical ordering)
- Merge to main when ready
DON'T:
- Worry about version conflicts (EPIC component differs)
- Try to synchronize version numbers across Epics
- Force sequential version numbers
4. Document Edge Cases
DO:
- Document Task/Story renumbering
- Explain version mapping if gaps exist
- Note any special circumstances
DON'T:
- Hide edge cases
- Assume version numbers are always sequential
- Skip documentation for special cases
Related Documentation
- Integration Guide:
docs/architecture/standards-and-adrs/dev-kit-kanban-versioning-rw-integration.md - FR/BR Intake Guide:
packages/frameworks/kanban/FR_BR_INTAKE_GUIDE.md - Release Workflow Guide:
packages/frameworks/workflow mgt/docs/documentation/Developer_Docs/vwmp/release-workflow-agent-execution.md - Validation Reports:
- T002: Kanban → Versioning validation
- T003: Versioning → RW validation
- T004: RW → Kanban validation
- T007: Gap resolution summary
Version History
- v1.0.0 (2025-12-02): Initial version created (E4:S03:T06)
End of Integration Examples and Edge Cases