Skip to main content

ICW-E2S01T17-Test-Design: FR-077 IPW-built Task Status Transition and Kboard Sync

Task: E2:S01:T17
Related FR: FR-077
Host Task: T17-ipw-built-task-status-transition-and-kboard-sync-fr077.md
Created: 2026-04-09


Test Strategy

Validate transition timing, ownership, and synchronization contracts so implementation work cannot leave task status stale across task docs and kboard.


Coverage Matrix

  1. Planning-only scenario guard (AC-1)

    • Input: IPW artifacts created, no implementation commits.
    • Expectation: task remains TODO; no false transition.
  2. Implementation start transition (AC-1/AC-2)

    • Input: first non-planning implementation evidence appears.
    • Expectation: transition to IN PROGRESS is required by documented owner step.
  3. Completion evidence transition (AC-1/AC-2)

    • Input: acceptance criteria evidence present.
    • Expectation: transition to COMPLETE only when evidence gates pass.
  4. Atomic propagation check (AC-3)

    • Input: status transition event.
    • Expectation: task-doc status and kboard row status update in the same change set/session.
  5. Drift detection regression (AC-4)

    • Input: simulated implemented-but-TODO state.
    • Expectation: audit/validator reports mismatch deterministically.
  6. Ownership clarity verification (AC-2/AC-3)

    • Input: updated docs/workflow instructions.
    • Expectation: no contradictory ownership language across IPW/RW/UKW guidance.

Failure Modes

  • Task transitions to IN PROGRESS during planning-only activity.
  • COMPLETE applied without acceptance evidence.
  • Task-doc and kboard statuses diverge after transition.
  • Drift check fails to detect implemented-but-TODO state.
  • Documentation leaves ownership ambiguous across workflows.

Red/Green Verification Sequence

  1. Add failing tests/checks for planning-only, start, completion, and drift scenarios.
  2. Implement transition policy behavior until transition timing checks pass.
  3. Implement atomic propagation contract checks.
  4. Implement drift detection and reporting checks.
  5. Re-run full suite including ownership-document consistency checks.

Regression Guard Checklist

  • Planning-only does not trigger status escalation.
  • First implementation evidence triggers IN PROGRESS requirement.
  • COMPLETE requires acceptance verification evidence.
  • Task-doc and kboard are synchronized atomically on transition.
  • Drift audit detects stale TODO mismatches.
  • Cross-doc ownership wording remains consistent.

Evidence for Handoff

  • Scenario matrix mapped to FR-077 AC-1..AC-4.
  • Example mismatch fixtures for drift detection.
  • Pass/fail checklist for transition timing and synchronization guarantees.