Feature Request: FR/BR/UXR Repository Stories (S00 Pattern)
Type: Feature Request (FR)
Submitted: 2025-12-11
Submitted By: User
Priority: HIGH
Status: ACCEPTED
Supersession note (2026-04): This FR remains the historical baseline that introduced dedicated FR/BR/UXR repository stories. For new intake behavior, see FR-072 (Approach D phased migration) and FR-074 (semantic placement KG-R6). Repository-story anchors remain valid for historical traceability.
Implementing Task: E5:S01:T21
Summary
Establish a formal repository pattern for Feature Requests (FRs), Bug Reports (BRs), and User Experience Research (UXR) reports by creating Story 1 (S01) in Epics 5, 6, and 7. Each FR/BR/UXR becomes a task in its respective repository story, creating perfect 1:1 traceability (FR-001 = E5:S01:T01, BR-001 = E6:S01:T01, UXR-001 = E7:S01:T01).
Note: S00 is Epic-level abstract space only (no tasks). Repository stories migrated from S00 to S01 as part of repository story abstract space resolution (E9:S01:T08).
Description
What is the Feature?
A formal repository pattern that:
-
Creates Repository Stories (S01):
- Epic 5, Story 1: "FR Repo" - canonical home for all Feature Requests
- Epic 6, Story 1: "BR Repo" - canonical home for all Bug Reports
- Epic 7, Story 1: "UXR Repo" - canonical home for all User Experience Research reports
-
Establishes 1:1 Traceability:
- FR-001 → E5:S01:T01 (story-level abstract space: v0.5.1.1+0)
- BR-001 → E6:S01:T01 (story-level abstract space: v0.6.1.1+0)
- UXR-001 → E7:S01:T01 (story-level abstract space: v0.7.1.1+0)
- Bidirectional: E5:S01:T01 → FR-001
-
Formalizes Intake Workflow:
- Every FR/BR/UXR gets committed to its repository story (S01:Txx)
- Intake workflow still analyzes content and assigns implementation work to appropriate epics/stories
- Traceability bridge links repository anchor → implementation work
-
Defines PERPETUAL State:
- Repository stories (E5:S01, E6:S01, E7:S01) are PERPETUAL (never complete)
- Excluded from completion analytics
- Omitted from epic checklist displays in board views (UX optimization)
Note: S00 is Epic-level abstract space only (no tasks). Repository stories migrated from S00 to S01 as part of repository story abstract space resolution (E9:S01:T08).
What Should Happen vs. What Currently Happens?
Expected Behavior:
- New FR-001 filed → Automatically assigned to E5:S01:T01
- FR-001 committed → Story-level abstract space v0.5.1.1+0 established
- Intake workflow analyzes FR-001 content → Assigns implementation to E12:S03:T05 (Frontend)
- Traceability bridge: E5:S01:T01 → E12:S03:T05
- Board views omit E5:S01, E6:S01, E7:S01 from epic checklists (reduce clutter)
- Repository stories tracked internally but not displayed in board summaries
Current Behavior:
- FRs are filed and stored in
fr-br/FR-001.md - Intake workflow assigns FRs to appropriate epics/stories based on content
- No formal repository anchor for FRs/BRs/UXRs
- No 1:1 mapping between FR number and Kanban task
- Traceability relies on cross-references and intake decisions
When Does It Occur?
This feature is needed:
- Every time an FR/BR/UXR is filed - Should get repository anchor (S01:Txx)
- During intake workflow - Repository anchor established before implementation assignment
- When viewing Kanban board - Repository stories omitted from display (UX)
Who is Affected?
Primary Affected:
- Intake workflow (must assign FR/BR/UXR to S01:Txx)
- Kanban board views (must omit S01 stories from displays)
- Developers filing FRs/BRs/UXRs (automatic assignment to repository)
Secondary Affected:
- Release Workflow (versioning for repository tasks)
- Kanban policy (PERPETUAL state definition)
- Board display logic (omission rules)
Problem / Anti-Pattern
- No formal repository pattern for FRs/BRs/UXRs
- No 1:1 traceability between FR number and Kanban task
- FRs exist in
fr-br/directory but lack canonical Kanban anchor - Intake workflow assigns FRs to implementation epics but no repository anchor
- Traceability relies on cross-references rather than formal structure
Requirements
Functional Requirements
- FR-021:R01 - Create Epic 5, Story 1: "FR Repo" (PERPETUAL) - ✅ COMPLETE (E9:S01:T08)
- FR-021:R02 - Create Epic 6, Story 1: "BR Repo" (PERPETUAL) - ✅ COMPLETE (E9:S01:T08)
- FR-021:R03 - Create Epic 7, Story 1: "UXR Repo" (PERPETUAL)
- FR-021:R04 - Policy: Every FR gets E5:S01:Txx assignment (FR-001 = T01) - ✅ COMPLETE (E9:S01:T08)
- FR-021:R05 - Policy: Every BR gets E6:S01:Txx assignment (BR-001 = T01) - ✅ COMPLETE (E9:S01:T08)
- FR-021:R06 - Policy: Every UXR gets E7:S01:Txx assignment (UXR-001 = T01)
- FR-021:R07 - Intake workflow assigns FR/BR/UXR to S01:Txx before implementation assignment - ✅ COMPLETE (E9:S01:T08)
- FR-021:R08 - Repository stories marked as PERPETUAL state - ✅ COMPLETE (E9:S01:T08)
- FR-021:R09 - Repository stories excluded from completion analytics - ✅ COMPLETE (E9:S01:T08)
- FR-021:R10 - Repository stories omitted from epic checklist displays in board views - ✅ COMPLETE (E9:S01:T08)
- FR-021:R11 - Repository stories still tracked internally in Epic documents - ✅ COMPLETE (E9:S01:T08)
Non-Functional Requirements
- FR-021:NF01 - Traceability: Perfect 1:1 mapping FR-001 = E5:S01:T01 - ✅ COMPLETE (E9:S01:T08)
- FR-021:NF02 - UX: Board views remain uncluttered (S01 stories omitted) - ✅ COMPLETE (E9:S01:T08)
- FR-021:NF03 - Consistency: Same pattern for FR, BR, UXR
Scope Analysis
Problem Domain: Kanban Structure, Intake Workflow, Traceability
Affected Areas:
- Backend/API (intake workflow logic)
- Frontend/UI
- Database/Schema
- Documentation (Kanban policy, board display rules)
- Testing (intake workflow, board display)
- Other: Kanban framework templates, Epic 5/6/7 structure
Estimated Complexity:
- Simple (1-3 days)
- Medium (1 week)
- Complex (2+ weeks)
- Very Complex (1+ month)
Use Cases
Primary Use Case:
- Developer files FR-001 via GitHub issue
- Intake workflow runs:
- Assigns FR-001 to E5:S01:T01 (repository anchor)
- Analyzes FR-001 content
- Assigns implementation to E12:S03:T05 (Frontend)
- Creates traceability bridge: E5:S01:T01 → E12:S03:T05
- FR-001 committed → Story-level abstract space v0.5.1.1+0 established
- Board view shows Epic 5 with S02-S08 (S01 omitted for UX)
- Internal Epic 5 document shows S01 in Story Checklist (tracked internally)
Additional Use Cases:
- Meta-grouping: E5:S02 "Authentication Features" references E5:S01:T05, T12, T23 (task numbers only)
- Traceability lookup: Find FR-001 → Go to E5:S01:T01
- Version lookup: v0.5.1.1+0 → E5:S01:T01 → FR-001
Acceptance Criteria
- AC1: Epic 5, Story 1 "FR Repo" created (PERPETUAL) - ✅ COMPLETE (E9:S01:T08)
- AC2: Epic 6, Story 1 "BR Repo" created (PERPETUAL) - ✅ COMPLETE (E9:S01:T08)
- AC3: Epic 7, Story 1 "UXR Repo" created (PERPETUAL)
- AC4: Policy: FR-001 = E5:S01:T01, BR-001 = E6:S01:T01, UXR-001 = E7:S01:T01 - ✅ COMPLETE (E9:S01:T08)
- AC5: Intake workflow assigns FR/BR/UXR to S01:Txx before implementation assignment - ✅ COMPLETE (E9:S01:T08)
- AC6: Repository stories marked PERPETUAL in Kanban policy - ✅ COMPLETE (E9:S01:T08)
- AC7: Repository stories excluded from completion analytics - ✅ COMPLETE (E9:S01:T08)
- AC8: Repository stories omitted from epic checklist displays in board views - ✅ COMPLETE (E9:S01:T08)
- AC9: Repository stories still tracked internally in Epic documents - ✅ COMPLETE (E9:S01:T08)
- AC10: Meta-grouping supports task number references (E5:S01:T05, T12, T23) - ✅ COMPLETE (E9:S01:T08)
Design Decisions
Story 1 (S01) Repository Pattern
Decision: Use Story 1 (S01) as repository story, not Story 0.
Rationale:
- S00 is Epic-level abstract space only (v0.5.0.0+0) - maintains abstract space concept
- S01 repository story (v0.5.1.0+0) provides clear separation between abstract space and concrete repository
- Keeps current meaningful stories (S02-S08) intact (renumbered from S01-S07)
- S01 is semantically distinct from S02+ (repository vs. work units)
- Aligns with abstract space concept (FR-018) and repository story resolution (E9:S01:T08)
PERPETUAL State
Decision: Repository stories are PERPETUAL (never complete).
Rationale:
- Repository stories are containers, not work units
- They grow indefinitely (FR-001 through FR-999+)
- Completion is not meaningful for repositories
- Excluded from completion analytics
Board Display Omission
Decision: Omit E5:S01, E6:S01, E7:S01 from epic checklist displays in board views.
Rationale:
- Reduces board clutter (100+ tasks in S01)
- Repository stories are infrastructure, not work items
- Still tracked internally in Epic documents
- Policy documents omission rules
Meta-Grouping
Decision: Meta-grouping uses task numbers only (E5:S01:T05, T12, T23), not FR numbers.
Rationale:
- Task numbers are canonical (E5:S00:T05)
- FR numbers add noise and admin overhead
- Risk of incorrect filing if FR numbers required
- Implementation-focused grouping
- FR traceability available via task if needed
Dependencies
Blocks:
- Perfect traceability for FRs/BRs/UXRs
- Formal repository pattern
- Strengthened intake workflow
Blocked By:
- None (can be implemented independently)
Related Work:
- FR-018: Abstract Space for Zero-Numbered E/S/T Docs (S00 Epic-level abstract space concept)
- E9:S01:T08: Repository Story Abstract Space Contradiction (migration from S00 to S01)
- E2:S11: Intake Workflow Automation (intake workflow integration)
- E4:S02: FR/BR Intake to Tasks (intake foundation)
- E5:S02-S08: Current FR Implementation stories (preserved, renumbered from S01-S07)
Intake Decision
Intake Status: ACCEPTED
Intake Date: 2025-12-11
Intake By: AI Agent (Auto)
Decision Flow Results:
- New Story Created: Epic 4, Story 12 → Task 00 (Story creation)
Assigned To:
- Epic: Epic 4 (Kanban Framework)
- Story: Story 12 (FR/BR/UXR Repository Stories)
- Task: T00-T10 (Story creation and implementation tasks)
- Version:
v0.4.12.0+0(Story creation)
Kanban Links:
- Epic:
docs/project-management/kanban/epics/Epic-4/Epic-4.md - Story:
docs/project-management/kanban/epics/Epic-4/Story-012-fr-br-uxr-repository-stories.md - Task: See Story 12 task checklist
Rationale
Why This Matters:
- Traceability: Perfect 1:1 mapping FR-001 = E5:S01:T01
- Formalization: Establishes repository pattern as defined structure
- Intake Workflow: Strengthens intake by formalizing repository anchor
- Design Philosophy: S01 repository story pattern with S00 as Epic-level abstract space
Why This Should Be Implemented:
- Current system lacks formal repository pattern
- No 1:1 traceability between FR number and Kanban task
- Intake workflow assigns FRs but doesn't create repository anchor
- Traceability relies on cross-references rather than formal structure
Implementation Notes
Key Considerations:
-
S00 Epic-Level Abstract Space:
- E5:S00 abstract space: v0.5.0.0+0 (Epic-level only, no tasks)
- E6:S00 abstract space: v0.6.0.0+0 (Epic-level only, no tasks)
- E7:S00 abstract space: v0.7.0.0+0 (Epic-level only, no tasks)
-
S01 Repository Story:
- E5:S01 repository story: v0.5.1.0+0 (Story-level abstract space, contains tasks)
- E6:S01 repository story: v0.6.1.0+0 (Story-level abstract space, contains tasks)
- E7:S01 repository story: v0.7.1.0+0 (Story-level abstract space, contains tasks)
- FR-001 gets v0.5.1.1+0 (first task in repository)
-
Intake Workflow Integration:
- Step 1: Assign FR/BR/UXR to S01:Txx (repository anchor)
- Step 2: Analyze content for implementation assignment
- Step 3: Assign implementation work to appropriate epic/story
- Step 4: Create traceability bridge (S01:Txx → implementation)
-
Board Display Logic:
- Epic checklist displays: Omit S01 stories
- Epic document Story Checklist: Include S01 (tracked internally)
- Policy documents: Define omission rules
-
Meta-Grouping:
- E5:S02 "Authentication Features" → References: E5:S01:T05, T12, T23
- No FR numbers in grouping (task numbers only)
- FR traceability via task if needed
Implementation Approach:
- Create E5:S01, E6:S01, E7:S01 repository story documents
- Update Epic 5, 6, 7 documents with S01 in Story Checklist
- Update Kanban policy with PERPETUAL state definition
- Update board display logic to omit S01 stories
- Update intake workflow to assign FR/BR/UXR to S01:Txx
- Update versioning policy with S01 repository story pattern
- Migration Note: Repository stories migrated from S00 to S01 as part of E9:S01:T08 (Repository Story Abstract Space Contradiction resolution)
- Document meta-grouping pattern
References
- FR-018:
docs/project-management/kanban/fr-br/FR-018-abstract-space-zero-numbered-est-docs.md - E2:S11:
docs/project-management/kanban/epics/Epic-2/Story-011-intake-workflow-automation.md - E4:S02:
docs/project-management/kanban/epics/Epic-4/Story-002-fr-br-intake-to-tasks.md - Epic 5 Template:
packages/frameworks/kanban/templates/epics/Epic-5-FR-Implementation.md - Epic 6 Template:
packages/frameworks/kanban/templates/epics/Epic-6-BR-Implementation.md - Epic 7 Template:
packages/frameworks/kanban/templates/epics/Epic-7-UXR.md - Kanban Policy:
docs/project-management/rituals/policy/kanban-governance-policy.md
Template Usage:
This FR follows the Kanban Framework FR template.
This feature request is part of the Kanban Framework. See packages/frameworks/kanban/ for complete framework documentation.